Transcript for: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQkyouPOrD4

Search Words:   Any:     All:            
(Click on a 'Start Time' to view the video)
0:00Back in April of this year I made a video examining major changes that were brewing
0:05in the ENSO weather and ocean current system down here in the South Pacific. Most of us will
0:11have heard of the two extremes of that system, the cooler than average La Nina phase and the warmer
0:16than average El Nino phase. There’s also a neutral phase, which is roughly where the ENSO system was
0:22when that April video was made, having been in the cooler La Nina phase for an unusually long period
0:28of about three years. Meteorologists classify the warmer El Nino event as occurring when sea surface
0:34temperature in the Niño three-four region of the Pacific Ocean reaches nought-point-five degrees
0:39Celsius above average. Temperatures above THAT indicate STRONGER El Niño conditions.
0:45All the projections coming out of the major meteorological organisations at the time were
0:50for a moderate to strong El Nino event to develop during Summer twenty-twenty-three and continue
0:55into Spring twenty-twenty-four. There was nothing unusual in that prediction. It’s a perfectly
1:00normal consequence of the natural ebbs and flows in wind patterns and ocean currents in that part
1:06of the world. What was unusual though, was the record high sea surface temperatures that ALREADY
1:12existed in almost every other region of our global oceans as a direct consequence of climate change.
1:19By July, the average peak sea surface temperature in the Niño three four region
1:24had moved up to about one degree Celsius above average, with a trajectory taking it
1:28towards one-point-nine-nine degrees Celsius by December, indicating that the coming El
1:32Nino was going to be significantly stronger than originally expected. By August that
1:39prediction had changed though. It now looks more like reaching two-point-three degrees
1:42Celsius above average by the end of the year, prompting the world’s inherently cautious and
1:47conservative weather agencies to predict a VERY strong El Nino event into twenty-twenty-four,
1:53triggering what they describe as ‘extreme and potentially destructive weather globally’.
2:00So, a combination of record high sea surface temperatures and a very strong El Nino event
2:04may be about to give us humans a rather unpleasant sample of the ‘new normal’ as
2:09we hurtle towards mid-century. And one of the major threats that these extreme weather events
2:13are increasingly exposing, is the fragility and vulnerability of our global food supply network.
2:26Hello and welcome to Just Have a Think Now as I’m sure you know, the oceans cover
2:31more than seventy percent of Earth’s surface and they’re slower to absorb and release heat than
2:37our atmosphere is. That creates what the science bods call “thermal inertia" which mitigates the
2:43global average temperature increase across land and sea. In a recent interview with the Guardian,
2:48oceanographer and climate scientist at the University of New South Wales, Prof Matthew
2:53England explained that heating one cubic metre of air by one degree Celsius takes about two
2:59thousand joules of energy. But to heat the same volume of WATER by the SAME AMOUNT requires four
3:06million-two-hundred-thousand joules of energy. “By absorbing all this heat,” England says, “the
3:13ocean lulls people into a false sense of security that climate change is progressing slowly.”
3:19To understand and track the rising energy imbalance in the oceans,
3:22studies regularly measure ocean heat content or OHC. In this twenty-twenty-one study,
3:28scientists from around the world analysed thousands of global ocean temperature readings,
3:33each taken during that year from depths of at least two thousand metres. The paper’s authors
3:39found that, despite the cooler La Nina conditions that existed when the research was carried out,
3:44ocean temperatures had elevated by about fourteen zettajoules compared to the previous year.
3:51A Zettajoule is apparently ten to the power of twenty-one joules of energy which, to be honest,
3:57is a number that my limited brain finds extremely difficult to comprehend or imagine.
4:02Luckily though, our ever-helpful scientists have crunched the numbers into something a bit
4:06more tangible for folks like you and me. So, the twenty-twenty-one temperature increase of fourteen
4:13zettajoules turns out to be roughly the equivalent of detonating seven Hiroshima atomic bombs in the
4:19ocean every second of every minute of every day, for three hundred and sixty-five days. If that’s
4:26not mind blowing enough for you, how about this technical chart published in the last IPCC report
4:32showing that between nineteen-seventy-one and twenty-eighteen our oceans absorbed
4:39three hundred and ninety-six zettajoules of heat. And the increase in ocean temperature,
4:43according to the data, has been accelerating, with the result that, by Spring twenty-twenty-three,
4:49we had global sea-surface temperature anomalies that proper, rational, cautious science types
4:55were describing with phrases like ‘off the charts’ and “into uncharted territory’.
5:01Overlay a strongly warming El Nino event onto that already overheating global system
5:06and you’ve got a situation that you need to pay attention to, to say the least.
5:11You can get the full low down on how and why the ENSO system works the way it does by jumping back
5:17to my previous video, so I won’t repeat all of that here, suffice to say that when El Niño
5:22events arise, the interactions between the ocean and atmosphere create temporary changes that are,
5:28unsurprisingly, most strongly experienced in the regions closest to it, but that can also have
5:33significant and potentially catastrophic impacts on weather systems across most of the globe.
5:38The obvious manifestation of all this extra heat is the dramatic increase in extreme weather events
5:43that we all now see in our newsfeeds on an almost daily basis. According to the US National Oceanic
5:49and Atmospheric Administration or NOAA, the United States has already beaten its own record for the
5:55most natural disasters causing a billion dollars or more of damage in a single year. And there’s
6:01still four months of the year to go! The total cost to the nation so far is almost sixty billion
6:07dollars. Similar impacts have been felt in every inhabited continent on the planet, most recently
6:12demonstrated by the desperate scenes in Libya that we’re witnessing as I’m making this video
6:17in early September. What we humans are less good at focussing on though are the longer-term impacts
6:24of those events on our increasingly interconnected and interdependent global food supply network.
6:30Even if you’re fortunate enough to avoid six feet of water flooding into your home
6:35or a wildfire destroying your entire town, and even if you live in a wealthy western
6:39nation with lots of infrastructure and resources for dealing with such events,
6:44if food becomes scarce then all sorts of really very unpleasant consequences start kicking in.
6:51Much smarter analysts than me tend to use cereal crops like maize,
6:55rice and wheat as their barometer for global market stability. This study from July
6:59twenty-twenty-two provides us with a nice tangle of spaghetti lines showing how the supply of wheat
7:05criss-crosses the planet every day, stabilising each nation’s increasingly wobbly crop yields,
7:11providing basic nourishment for more than two-point-five billion human beings,
7:15and of course feeding the insatiable modern Mammon of GDP and global economic growth. The paper’s
7:22researchers offer us the rather stark conclusion that “Few will remain unaffected by the new global
7:29food shock given the highly interconnected nature of contemporary agri-food systems.”
7:35Another study, published in December twenty-twenty-two explains that
7:40“countries' reliance on global food trade networks implies that regionally different
7:44climate change impacts on crop yields will be transmitted across borders.” This redistribution,
7:51say the papers authors, “constitutes a significant challenge for climate
7:55adaptation planning and may affect how countries engage in cooperative action.”
8:00Aaah! ‘co-operative action’…yeah…
8:05The paper investigates the long-term potential impacts of climate change on global food trade
8:11networks of ALL THREE key crops: wheat, rice AND maize, projecting that major
8:16threats to global food security can be brought about by quite modest production changes in
8:21just a few major global producers. The big challenge, say the papers authors,
8:26is whether the MAIN GLOBAL EXPORTERS WHOSE NAMES ARE SHOWN ON THESE so-called ‘trade communities’
8:32charts can balance production and import losses in some of the world’s most vulnerable countries.
8:40And it’s not just scientific researchers that are ringing alarm bells either. The
8:45data are being very seriously analysed and increasingly applied in the decisions
8:49taken by global financial institutions like insurance companies and banks.
8:54Here’s a report by none other than Barclays from January twenty-twenty-three.
8:58Now, before you start throwing things at the screen and screaming that Barclays are one
9:03of the world’s worst offenders when it comes to continuing to
9:06invest hundreds of millions of dollars into fossil fuels… I know and I agree.
9:10But it would appear that while their investment arm is no paragon of virtue,
9:15their actuaries do appear to have cottoned onto the seriousness of the situation.
9:21“The current food price volatility” Barclays explains “exposes the
9:25fragility of our global food system. Rising food insecurity, social unrest,
9:30displacement and migration are all possible effects.”
9:35The report explains that a phenomenon known as ‘Heatflation’ has already become part of the
9:41agricultural vernacular, describing how higher temperatures lead to smaller harvests and higher
9:46prices. 10:00 But, it’s not just extreme heat that hurts crop yields of course. It’s all the
9:51severe flooding, more frequent landslides and unexpected frosts that are also causing huge
9:56amounts of damage, even in mighty economies like the United States of America and Europe.
10:02The floods in Pakistan between July and October last year washed away nearly half that country’s
10:07crops, at an estimated cost of two-point-three billion dollars. Vegetable prices spiked by
10:12five hundred percent as a result. Drought in the Horn of Africa forced millions of people to
10:17migrate in search of food. And here in Europe, record-breaking heatwaves last year in the UK,
10:23France, Italy, Spain and Germany did severe damage to summer crops including maize, sunflower and
10:30soybeans, all of which has mostly been repeated during this year’s European heatwave as well.
10:35The world’s largest food PRODUCER AND largest food IMPORTER, China, experienced extreme heat
10:42and a month-long drought during the rainy season in the south, threatening domestic autumn crops,
10:47and extreme floods this year which have caused similar levels of damage.
10:52According to the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization, or FAO,
10:56sixty-three percent of the damage and loss to major economic sectors from disasters
11:01occurring between two-thousand and-eight and twenty-eighteen was shouldered by agriculture,
11:06with disaster-related losses recorded in crop and livestock production during that period estimated
11:12at two-hundred-and eighty-billion dollars. In the poorest countries, which accounted for almost half
11:18of all that impact, lost production translated to seven trillion kilocalories per year, which is the
11:24annual food consumption of seven million adults. The Barclays report concludes that the current
11:30food crisis is probably the worst in a decade. The authors argue that the
11:34consequences of climate change combined with trade restrictions and regional conflict,
11:39are rapidly reversing years of progress in the global battle against hunger and poverty.
11:45If you live in a net exporting country you may think well, we’ll just have to export
11:50less and use the yields to feed our own people - and indeed that is increasingly what’s being
11:54discussed. According to Barclays, many countries are responding with policies that amount to food
12:00protectionism, which on a global level, they say will only lead to further food insecurity
12:05as richer countries outcompete poorer ones in the race for scarce resources. And in any case,
12:12in the context of our modern global economic model, reduced exports lead to declining
12:18economies, even in rich countries, with all the socio-economic and political problems that I’m
12:23sure you don’t need me to bore you with here. This year’s ‘very strong’ El Nino event is,
12:28according to the WMO, highly likely to result in twenty-twenty-four becoming the hottest year
12:33ever recorded, and the hottest year we modern humans have ever had to contend with. It may
12:38even temporarily push the average global surface temperature back up to more than one-point-five
12:42degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. And the undeniable consequences have now arrived at
12:49our doorstep, even at that relatively modest level of warming. So, the complacency displayed by some
12:54commentators who suggest that two or three degrees Celsius of extra warming might be no
12:59bad thing for our planet starts to look just a little bit short sighted, don’t you think?
13:05Net importer, or net exporter, the message seems to be that we really are all in this together,
13:11whether we like it or not. Our economies are inextricably linked,
13:16funnily enough just like our oceans and our climate and all of nature’s other calibration
13:21systems that have allowed life on this little planet to thrive for millions of years. Knock
13:26all that out of kilter, which is what we’re doing at the moment, largely as a result of
13:30the greenhouse gas emissions from the production and combustion of fossil fuels, and the delicate
13:36balancing act we’ve benefitted so handsomely from is in real danger of collapsing around us.
13:43So, plenty to have a think about folks, eh? See you next week.